Talk:Raid on Kronstadt
Latest comment: 2 years ago by RoySmith in topic Did you know nomination
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Raid on Kronstadt article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A fact from Raid on Kronstadt appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 September 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on August 18, 2023. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
.jpg)
.svg)
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 16:33, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that 48 of the 55 British participants in the August 1919 Raid on Kronstadt received gallantry medals or were mentioned in despatches? Source: "The Kronstadt Raid became one of the most decorated operations in British naval history. Of the 55 participants in the air and sea, no less than 48 received an award, either being decorated or Mentioned in Despatches" from: Wright, Damien (27 July 2017). Churchill's Secret War With Lenin: British and Commonwealth Military Intervention in the Russian Civil War, 1918–20. Helion and Company. p. 371. ISBN 978-1-913118-11-2.
Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 08:59, 9 September 2022 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- not at sentence end, technically - Interesting:
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Another almost perfect nomination. I have added "gallantry" in the article body as well, so it's easier for readers to find the hook info. However, I then noticed that there's no citation directly after that sentence. Could you please duplicate the appropriate one? I know that's a bit nit-picky since refs appear just one sentence later, but it's also not difficult to do I think :) –LordPeterII (talk) 18:05, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi LordPeterII, thanks for your review. I've duplicated the ref- Dumelow (talk) 06:33, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Approve (in good faith; source is online but I can't seem to access it from my country or sth). –LordPeterII (talk) 14:15, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi LordPeterII, thanks for your review. I've duplicated the ref- Dumelow (talk) 06:33, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
