Talk:Raid over Moscow

Fair use rationale for Image:Raid over moscow.jpg

Image:Raid over moscow.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:29, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page ~~ GB fan ~~ 05:34, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

---

Raid over Moscow → Raid Over Moscow — The current version has the wrong caps in the second word (is over, should be Over). — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 14:21, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

• Comment This will be closed as Not moved for lack of basis (and consensus) for changing the name. You can't just declare it should be "Over" instead of "over". References? --Born2cycle (talk) 01:58, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

• Oppose. Sorry, when it comes to capitalization we use our own guidelines (WP:CAPS) instead of following the subject's preference. Jafeluv (talk) 22:33, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Finnish controversy

Just dumping this here, a good and new source if someone wants to write about the controversy in Finland: http://www.pelitutkimus.fi/vuosikirja2011/ptvk2011-01.pdf (in Finnish). The documents have been declassified in 2010. --Yaamboo (talk) 11:12, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Don't mean to be anti-euro, but is there an English translation? I'd gladly look through it and reference it - except I don't understand it... a_man_alone (talk) 11:29, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Sadly, not more than the abstract... I'll try to look into it someday, if other Finns aren't quicker :) --Yaamboo (talk) 18:04, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

title change

It wasn't just the Finns that thought the title tasteless. When the game was rereleased as a budget platinum title the name in the UK was changed to simply "Raid" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.180.81.133 (talk) 07:56, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

True, and the name change is already mentioned in the lede. a_man_alone (talk) 12:32, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

published in europe

Very strange that the opening sentence implies that the game was published only in Europe. It was a US-developed game, sold in the US, and additionally published in europe by us gold. It was probably published in other markets by other publishers too. It seems like an irrelevant detail. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.0.83.50 (talk) 20:06, 1 April 2018 (UTC)