Talk:Rain, Rain, Go Away (short story)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
(jordan anthony kilmer) 4/11/2014 10:02 P.m. Washington state, Everett...The rain rain go away is about a old man who had sex.
Multiple Tags from November 2011
editI see that someone tagged this page in November 2011 without bothering to post to the talk page. I'm accordingly doing so now to foster discussion. GodaiNoBaka (talk) 18:06, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
...relies largely or entirely upon a single source
editWould the original tagger (or anybody else) like to elaborate here on this? Unless you're looking for critical treatments of the story to cite (and I doubt you're going to find any, since this is one of Asimov's lesser short stories and probably not a lot has ever been written about it) I don't know what kind of sources you're looking for. GodaiNoBaka (talk) 18:11, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
...relies on references to primary sources or sources affiliated with the subject, rather than references from independent authors and third-party publications
editSee above. If someone can find a critical treatment of this story, it'll certainly not hurt the article to cite it, but I doubt such a thing exists. GodaiNoBaka (talk) 18:14, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
The notability of this article's subject is in question.
editI completely agree. "Buy Jupiter" is filled with stories which Asimov himself admitted weren't always his best, and which he hesitated to allow to be republished. I question the notability of the compendium as a whole on that basis. To also have a separate page for each story (some only a couple of pages long) really requires some support on notability grounds. GodaiNoBaka (talk) 18:27, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Good point. Although there are some decent stories in "Buy Jupiter" this is actually one of the weaker stories in the collection, I doubt if you will find many third-party references about it. Even with as important a writer as Asimov, can we regard every single short story he wrote as inherently notable? The collection as a whole surely is. See John Wyndham, another important SF writer, we do not have an article for every short story but we do have for the collections. PatGallacher (talk) 18:05, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Better Summary
editThk is piece is poorly written and needs to be redine. Did anyone actully read the story or just look up the summary? Link02 (talk) 15:44, 14 October 2014 (UTC)