Talk:Raise the Titanic!

Latest comment: 5 years ago by NatGertler in topic The Titanic Secret

Don't you think we should split the film and book onto separate pages ? -- Beardo 03:46, 23 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Not sure the film is really notable enough to stand on its own.--Ulysses411 15:32, 23 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Titanic book.jpg

edit
 

Image:Titanic book.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

There was also a serialization that appeared in the Sunday comics

edit

I remember seeing a serialization in the Sunday comics that was drawn from the novel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.183.110.93 (talk) 23:31, 13 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Titanic Secret

edit

Why no mention of The Titanic Secret which is a 2019-written follow-on to Raise the Titanic?

Just curious. 2600:8800:784:8F00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 22:07, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Because you haven't added it to the article. --Nat Gertler (talk) 22:20, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply