Talk:Rajshree-class patrol vessel
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Jafeluv in topic Requested move
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
_without_national_boundaries.svg)
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 18:09, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
- Rajshree class inshore patrol vessel → Rajshree-class inshore patrol vessel
- Rani Abbakka class inshore patrol vessel → Rani Abbakka-class inshore patrol vessel
- Sarojini Naidu class Extra-fast patrol vessel → Sarojini Naidu-class extra-fast patrol vessel
- Priyadarshini class patrol vessel → Priyadarshini-class patrol vessel
- Rajhans class patrol vessel → Rajhans-class patrol vessel
– this seems to be the correct naming convention for articles about classes of naval vessels, i.e. Kitty Hawk-class aircraft carrier. Bensci54 (talk) 20:19, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support It's also an appropriate use of a hyphen. --BDD (talk) 19:12, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support - Of course! Anir1uph | talk | contrib 20:54, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.