This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
A fact from Ralph Anderson (architect) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 November 2008, and was viewed approximately 1,540 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that shortly after architect Ralph Anderson's early "modernist glass-box phase" he began rehabilitating turn-of-the-century buildings (example pictured) in Seattle's Pioneer Square district?
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
In removing an external link from article text, I wrote the edit summary "We don't do external links from the middle of an article. Either Bumgardner Partnership deserve an article, or they don't deserve a link." There is a third case - an external links section - but since Bumgardner Partnership's web site would be only tangentially connected to to this topic, that's not appropriate here.
My guess is that they do deserve an article, but I don't particularly want to research and write it. I'd be all for someone else doing so. - Jmabel | Talk17:51, 29 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
