Talk:Ralph W. Aigler

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleRalph W. Aigler has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 18, 2008Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 31, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that law professor Ralph Aigler, once known as the "dominant figure in Michigan's athletics," negotiated the Big Ten's exclusive contracts with the Rose Bowl in 1946 and 1953?

GA review

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)

Mainly some quotations needing citations. A few awkward spots in the prose. And some publishers needed on the web cite references

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Any information on his personal life at all? And a bit more on his teaching career would be good, if possible.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Details:

His obituary (fn. 1) says he was 79 years old when he died in Aug. 1964. Accordingly, his birth year is an approximation. Despite checking numerous sources, I was unable to find either place of birth or precise date of birth. Cbl62 (talk) 04:10, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Year of birth verified in this tribute article. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0026-2234(196411)63%3A1%3C1%3AIMRWA1%3E2.0.CO%3B2-S Cbl62 (talk) 04:56, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • There is a bunch of information in the lede that isn't in the main text. Lede should summarize the article, not put out information not contained in the article (specifically the chairman of the Michigan Facult Board in Control of Athletics which really needs to be down in the Return to the Big Ten Conference section to make that section make any sense).  Y Cbl62 (talk) 04:50, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • need a citation on "no intention of being fair and accurate" in the third paragraph of the Spokesman section.
  • A LOT of paragraphs start with "In (date)..."... Three in Spokesmen section, four in Hiring...consider rewording to eliminate the redundancies.  Y - Eliminated all but one. Cbl62 (talk) 04:25, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • What are the **** standing for in the quote in the fourth paragraph of the Spokesman section?
The surviving edition of the Capital Times quoted from is partially illegible. I included the three asterisks to indicate that there is a missing word in the text. Rather than guess at the word (probably "create"), I thought the asterisks were the best way to handle. If there's another, preferred way, let me know. Cbl62 (talk) 04:17, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Neither his obituary, nor any of the references that are biographical in nature, say anything about Aigler's having married or had kids. Likely inference is that he did not marry, but none of the articles expressly say that either. I agree more information on his academic career would be good, but unfortunately the lives of law professors don't draw as much attention as athletics. As a result, most of the articles concerning Aigler's life relate to his involvement with University of Michigan athletics. I did include a citation to a complete list of Aigler's legal publications, but did not feel a review of the subject of those academic articles on property law and other legal topics would be helpful in a biographical article on Aigler, rather than an article on property law. Cbl62 (talk) 04:44, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Ealdgyth | Talk 19:17, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

What's the status on this? I'm heading out of town shortly and would like to know what I need to keep up with. Ealdgyth - Talk 02:48, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Passing it now. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:12, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ralph W. Aigler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:15, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply