This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 10 days ago4 comments2 people in discussion
The Globe spotlight article is a great source, but its contents require thoughtful and thorough documentation in the article to maintain neutrality within Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons. Please discuss here before re-adding a one-sentence summary of the article. I am working to give this source and others a properly fleshed out writeup to add to this article which abides by policy. Mangocove (talk) 20:25, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
There’s a significant amount of critical coverage published in major newspapers, so several well-sourced paragraphs detailing it would not violate BLP policy. Feel free to go into as great detail as possible. Thriley (talk) 20:36, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, that is my aim! I would prefer to add well-sourced and detailed information rather than a one-sentence summary which could be construed as biased under policy. Mangocove (talk) 20:44, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
I've dropped everything to write several paragraphs from the Globe article to avoid what I anxiously thought might come to an edit war. I just published the edit. There is more work to be done with more diverse sources but hopefully that will sate some people's urge to have that immediately included. Mangocove (talk) 21:29, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply