Talk:Ramoth-Gilead

Judaism Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ancient Near East Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bible Low‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I need this cross referenced to a gazeteer, or several Biblical maps. Or possibly even to one of the maps sites such as live local, or google maps etc.

At the top of the article there is a link to the coordinates of Ramoth-Gilead. Click on the coordinates and it'll lead you to all kinds of maps.Alephb (talk) 13:21, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

¶ re: REFERENCES, in Easton's Bible Dictionary, the article citation is clearly "Ramoth-Gilead" but I have been unable to correct the text of the article to show this. Sussmanbern (talk) 07:48, 25 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

I think I've got your problem fixed, User:Sussmanbern. Let me know if that's not what you had in mind.Alephb (talk) 12:02, 25 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic