Talk:Ramsay principle

Untitled

I removed the following text from the top of the article:

I am in the process of writing this page. I am saving it in small blocks to the internet as I go. If you are seeing this message you are looking at an intermediate version of the article. (If you are seeing this message after, say, 3 October 2005, I have died, or got bored, or something and you should remove it.) AndyJones 20:11, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

--81.154.236.221 18:42, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

IRC?

According to documents I have seen, court cases involving the Inland Revenue listed them as CIR, i.e. Commissioners of Inland Revenue, not IRC. Can we get a reference on IRC? 81.106.249.225 21:15, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

Well, the heading reads:

[1982] 300 A.C.

[HOUSE OF LORDS]

W. T. RAMSAY LTD. APPELLANTS AND

INLAND REVENUE COMMISSIONERS RESPONDENTS

EILBECK (INSPECTOR OF TAXES) RESPONDENT AND

RAWLING APPELLANT

You're right, though, I've seen CIR for Commissioners of Inland Revenue, too. AndyJones 12:53, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Ramsay principle/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

== WP Tax Class == Start class because the article discuess the principle but most of the article is on the case law that generated the law. The article should expand upon history, impact, context in respective sections to raise its class level.EECavazos 22:52, 15 November 2007 (UTC) == WP Tax Priority == Mid priority because concerns basic tax scheme (two actually) of a country, but it is corollary to the tax scheme itself.EECavazos 22:52, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Substituted at 21:56, 26 June 2016 (UTC)