Talk:Rancho Santa Fe, California

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2600:1012:B1C2:FE92:7961:FCDB:508A:225D in topic Nun

Income discrepancy

edit
"Males have a median income of over $100,000 versus $86,933 for females."
But, with females statistically living longer than males the females eventually tend to inherit that wealth. US Census Bureau data shows that, on average, nation-wide, females possess more wealth than males. This is due to the females inheriting the wealth amassed by males.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.50.0.167 (talkcontribs) 20:23, 19 February 2006

This doesn't really have any bearing on the article- you probably want to take this to entries about income disparity.Cottonflop (talk) 13:50, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sources of information?

edit

I imagine some of the information is from people who simply lived there, but what about a listing of some sources in this article?

Particularily interesting (to me) would be any official sources on the country club's practices of black balling, etc.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.32.127.187 (talkcontribs) 13:18, 1 May 2006

IF you include the total population of African Americans and Native Americans in the Dempgraphics section, you should also include the total population for the other ethnic groups. KTHX!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.241.203.130 (talkcontribs) 04:28, 27 October 2006

Residents

edit

All the references are broken and some entries are nonsense. (Ted Donny, owner of Sony?) 69.105.138.207 22:09, 8 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

One might argue that the "non-families" may in fact be members of the gay community living very much as families. There are many lovely gay residents of Rancho.

References

edit

I removed a lot of "fluff" and some of the notable people. These notable people could not be found under thier reference, so I removed them (because I could not verify them in any way). Also, I took out prominent and changed it to notable, sounds more encyclopedic. 69.227.173.45 01:46, 19 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Highest Income

edit

Money Magazine says that Hillsborough California is the highest income as of 2006:

1 Hillsborough, CA $263,456

http://money.cnn.com/magazines/moneymag/bplive/2007/top25s/highincomes.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.186.100.197 (talk) 04:36, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Citation for the colloquialism "Rancho"

edit

I was born and raised in a city adjacent to this community and I've never heard of Rancho Santa Fe being known locally as simply "Rancho". There are also several other communities in San Diego County whose names contain the word 'Rancho'. --crumb(talk) 21:39, 12 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have lived in the Covenant for 25 years and raised 3 children there. It is commonly referred to as Rancho as distinguished from surrounding communities — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rcsam (talkcontribs) 14:51, 1 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Residents missing citations

edit

A great deal of the residents and former residents listed lack citations, and have done for nearly a year and a half. Unless there are any objections, I would suggest this start being pruned.Cottonflop (talk) 16:02, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

"Covenant" section is advertising

edit

The new section "Covenant..." is mostly advertising, in violation of the most basic Wikipedia rules. In the near future, this section's text will be sharply curtailed and its tone corrected. Wikipedia is not some real estate brochure. Vindemiatrix (talk) 02:14, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rancho Santa Fe, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:51, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nun

edit

Snooty community and racist. 2600:1012:B1C2:FE92:7961:FCDB:508A:225D (talk) 16:12, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply