Talk:Randy Kuhl

Learn more about this page

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

New York (state) C‑class Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Congress

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

Untitled

172.142.242.185 and 204.168.97.160, we know who you are. This is no place for political propoganda. That's what franking privilege is for. Watch out -- this wouldn't look good in the press.

Campaign Websites

Latest comment: 18 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

It seems inappropriate to list the campaign website for his likely opponent in the links section. There is no link to Kuhl's campaign site on Eric Massa's page. If someone is looking for Eric Massa's campaign site, aren't they likely to go to his Wikipedia page to find it, not Kuhl's? If there is no objection, I intend to remove that link in a couple of days. If anyone feels different, please post here. Thanks. Souldrifter 18:34, 6 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

I think the link to massa's campaign should stay. I reciprocated by linking to Kuhl' campaign site on the Eric Massa page, something I had done before, but someone removed it. I now watch both Kuhl's and Massa's pages and will ensure that the campaign links stay (unless of course there is some sort of consensus that they should be deleted) thanks for the heads-up Souldrifter User:Cjs56

It still seems goofy to me, personally, to list the opponent's campaign site on either page...however since each page has a link to the opponent's campaign site, at least it is fair...since you've contributed way more to these two particular articles than I have, I don't have a problem with your judgement... and since my reasoning is based on a personal opinion, not on any wikipedia guidelines and no harm is done, I'll shut my mouth and let you do your thing. Thanks for the response and for the dedication to the articles. Souldrifter 17:10, 7 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

I repeat the admonition of the gentleperson whose comments begin this page: This is not a place for propaganda; that is what the franking priviledge is for. I re-entered the information about the contents of the papers, which are historically noteworthy. I also reinserted the link to Massa's website as the Massa page reciprocates in this matter. I'm watching you: 216.144.250.162 --Cjs56 22:12, 27 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Note to 69.249.253.211

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.166.224.67 (talk • contribs) 05:02, 25 October 2006

POV tags

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

We're not mind-readers here. If you want to put a POV tag on the talk page or a section of the article, fine, but it's then incumbent on you to go into SPECIFICS about why you consider the text to be POV. Citing a wikipedia policy gets you bonus points (and some credibility), but isn't manadatory.

I've removed the tags; feel free to put them back AFTER you've explained, on this page, why you're posting them. Also, please note that I shortened the section on "Domestic disputes" (as well as removing the section heading); I suspect that doesn't address your POV concerns but mention it just in case. John Broughton | Talk 22:47, 1 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Randy Kuhl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100316025713/http://www.post-journal.com:80/page/content.detail/id/552581.html?nav=5018 to http://www.post-journal.com/page/content.detail/id/552581.html?nav=5018

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:35, 11 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Randy Kuhl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070701092614/http://www.acuratings.org/2006all.htm to http://www.acuratings.org/2006all.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927175058/http://www.stargazette.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20061115%2FNEWS01%2F61115029 to http://www.stargazette.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20061115%2FNEWS01%2F61115029
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.post-journal.com/page/content.detail/id/552581.html?nav=5018

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:31, 9 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Randy Kuhl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:20, 25 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic