Talk:Rapporteur
Latest comment: 1 year ago by J. Peter Riley in topic Confusing Definition
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
2007-02-9 Automated pywikipediabot message
edit | This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
--CopyToWiktionaryBot 02:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Dictionary entry in British and World English Oxford on-line dictionary. http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/rapporteur?q=rapporteur
Confusing Definition
editOn one hand, this article defines a Rappoteur as a person appointed to "report on the proceedings of its meetings," but the example given indicates a person appointed to "investigate" an issue. Maybe these are the same, but it would help much to clarify what the connection is.68.190.23.42 (talk) 19:01, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- I had the same reaction. The definition of "rapporteur" in Wiktionary matches the example in paragraph 2 and is at variance with paragraph 1. I just hesitate to change graf 1 because of uncertainty. Peter Riley (talk) 23:26, 6 March 2023 (UTC)