Talk:Rascals (Star Trek: The Next Generation)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 07:36, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

I will review this. MWright96 (talk) 07:36, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• no dab links

Plot

• "they use comm badges" - communication badges
• "With command function enabled," - With the command function enabled,
• "After the events, transporter is used to return Picard," - After the events, the transporter is used to return Picard,

Writing

• The wikilink for DNA should be on the first instance it is mentioned not the second

Direction and casting

• Remove the duplicate link for Rick Berman

Broadcast

• "This was part of an overall decline in ratings during the first part of the sixth season, the preceeding episode," - replace the first comma with a semi-colon
• "received a rating of 13.4 percent" - sentence lacks a full stop

Critical reception

• "Handlen said that the Miles/Keiko scene was "dramatically interesting", and said that the part of the episode with the Ferengi was "a nice mini-action movie that helps pick up a generally dodgy hour"." - reptition of the word "said"
• "He said that it resembled the Star Trek: The Animated Series episode "The Counter-Clock Incident", and said that the first act of "Rascals" was compelling." - same issue as above

References

• no dead links

On hold for now. MWright96 (talk) 12:26, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

@MWright96: Thanks for the review, I've addressed those points as suggested. Miyagawa (talk) 14:19, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Lovely. Can now promote to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 14:24, 18 August 2016 (UTC)