A fact from Rate-capping rebellion appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 December 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Because of the rules of surcharge ('joint and several liability') the total amount surcharged was considered as one and if one of the councillors went bankrupt the others had to pick up their share. There were collections within the Labour movement and on the left to help pay the surcharge, and in Lambeth some of the councillors themselves were wealthy enough to pay more than their immediate share (Bill Bowring owned family investments, for instance). Lambeth and Liverpool were somewhat different: the Lambeth councillors were mostly young, in their 20s and 30s, while Liverpool councillors were older. Sam Blacketer (talk) 20:12, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
