 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Merge
editI really don't see why we need 2 stubs for this. JMP EAX (talk) 23:14, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- When I wrote the above, I assumed that the material/def in Rational language is actually found in those sources, but that doesn't seem to be the case so see also Talk:Regular_language#Merger_proposal. In case someone can reference the def of rational language that isn't entirely synonymous with regular language, then it should be merged here. Otherwise it should be redirected to regular language. JMP EAX (talk) 00:41, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
- I would support the merge of rational language into this article. The equivalence of rational and regular languages is a theorem and I was hoping to put together some articles that explained those concepts, together with that of recognisable languages, especially when the setting is a more general monoid. For various reasons that never happened, so perhaps more energetic and knowledgeable editors will complete it at some stage. Deltahedron (talk) 06:41, 18 August 2014 (UTC)