Talk:RavenDB
Latest comment: 2 years ago by MarioGom in topic Feedback from New Page Review process
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Starting article
editLooks like this article had some copyright and other issues before (I can't see the other drafts, so I'm not sure what the issues were). It's now on a few other language versions of Wikipedia now, which don't seem to have any issues, so I just worked from some online versions like sv:RavenDB and others. MordecaiCohen2 (talk) 16:34, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Feedback from New Page Review process
editI left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Please, avoid citation overkill (WP:REFBOMB). You don't need 5 or 6 references for every simple fact. You can just use the best, reliable, secondary references. Most primary and non-reliable sources in this article could be simply removed..