Talk:Ray Hilborn
Latest comment: 3 years ago by 79.51.191.64 in topic Hilborn vs Pauly?
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of interest
editMr Hilborn and all his publications are suspect source: http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news/Blogs/makingwaves/the-overfishing-denier/blog/56432/ Thanks, GerardM (talk) 10:48, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Greenpeace's postion seems to be overstated. From [1]: "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and Science magazine have reviewed the charges Greenpeace made against Ray Hilborn for non-disclosure of funding sources and found he was not in violation of university or journal procedures". --Epipelagic (talk) 02:47, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Hilborn vs Pauly?
editDoes catch reflect abundance? https://www.nature.com/articles/494303a February 2013. Prof. Hilborn is right, but only recently fisheries scientists began to understand it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.51.191.64 (talk) 17:45, 3 February 2021 (UTC)