Talk:Ray McKinnon (actor)
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Amakuru in topic Requested move 4 May 2016
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
Requested move 4 May 2016
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved — Amakuru (talk) 09:29, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Ray McKinnon (actor) → Ray McKinnon – WP:TWODABS situation. The actor has received 37,370 views in the last 90 days, which amounts to 90% of the overall traffic.[1] Unreal7 (talk) 20:17, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support, as an Oscar winner he has more significance over the footballer anyway. Nohomersryan (talk) 02:54, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Dundee United: Ray McKinnon top of wanted list By Brian McLauchlin BBC Scotland 4 May 2016 In ictu oculi (talk) 08:03, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment. No doubt a blip but football Ray's current traffic stats are massively outstripping acting Ray. This will no doubt level off somewhat but football Ray's profile is clearly heightening and should the proposal go through there would be a lot of misdirected searches. Mutt Lunker (talk) 10:36, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Per my own comment above, the one below and the points made by opponents, Oppose. Mutt Lunker (talk) 14:28, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment – not a good time to place this RM request per the spike. I think that the actor has higher long-term significance, but would prefer to wait a few days to see how the views for the footballer look like. SSTflyer 13:46, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose, with some slight consideration towards the actor being the primary topic. However, I believe the current setup is not overly cumbersome, and the footballer has his moments of high hits, which would clearly make the actor being at the main page a problem for readers. So yeah, no move for now, come back later. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 02:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.