Talk:Reality

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Reality article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 6 months

Philosophy: Metaphysics / Ethics High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Metaphysics
	Ethics

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Many-worlds interpretation#Debate whether the other worlds are real|a debate as to how real the (other) worlds are]] The anchor (#Debate whether the other worlds are real) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Semi-protected edit request on 10 March 2024

Latest comment: 8 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

"add z to x,y,"

As I remember in school. The definition of reality is:

   The physical matter and it's smaller defined make, not reliant on perspective.

As this definition funtions in the use of objective reasoning as accurate, in comparison to subjective reasoning; the request submitted has a more practical and Lehman application that aids to a more populated use. "Narrative economics as a probable source". Yourpracticalword (talk) 10:38, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 16:58, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

In the lead, it should be "God," not "a 'God.'"

Latest comment: 5 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

1. "God," when capitalized, is a proper noun and refers to the concept in monotheism, not to one of many supernatural beings sometimes labeled "gods."

2. The rest of the article is written in American English, so the use of single instead of double quotation marks is inconsistent.

3. Adding quotation marks at all in this instance is a use of scare quotes. 2001:9E8:8C0:E200:888B:6AA7:C062:799F (talk) 06:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I changed it to "a god or gods". Shapeyness (talk) 08:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic