Talk:Really Love (KSI song)

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Lee Vilenski in topic GA Review

The song is based around a sample of DJ Pied Piper 'Do You Really Like It?' - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khW5leL19SA. Shouldn't this be mentioned in the article? They're listed in the personnel section already. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:202:CC00:25AC:5F37:3341:6378 (talk) 08:58, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Really Love (KSI song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 15:10, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures

edit
  • It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria -
  • It contains copyright infringements -
  • It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). -
  • It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -
edit

Prose

edit

Lede

edit

General

edit

GA Review

edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Review meta comments

edit
It's been a while Timwikisidemen, any update on the above? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 14:01, 29 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Sorry Lee Vilenski, I just don't have the time right now to complete this review any time soon. It'll probably be in the next month. I don't mind if you fail the article for now.-- Timwikisidemen 07:42, 30 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Sure, sadly I'll have to fail this one, but the info above will remain. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 12:30, 30 March 2021 (UTC)Reply