Talk:Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada by Justice Abella

Canada: Law Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The name of this (and similar) pages should be changed. Canadian courts don't give "opinions," they give reasons. 24.68.239.185 09:23, 22 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm willing to change it as long as you can point to some sources or examples of this. Admittedly, I was likely just following the US formatting in their comparable articles. --PullUpYourSocks 03:21, 23 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ok looks like the answer was right under my nose the whole time. If one looks at the headnote of any SCC judgment it lists the "reasons for judgment" not opinions. [1] --PullUpYourSocks 02:07, 8 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Add topic