Talk:Rebecca West

one of the foremost public intellectuals of the twentieth century

Ridiculous POV.

old comments

Rebecca West was born December, 21st

My understanding is that the full and correct quote ends, "...differentiate me from a doormat or a prostitute."

Personally, I do wish Ms. West had been more gracious toward sex workers, but I don't condone Bowdlerization through convenient ommission. {unsigned}

Methinks unsigned there wishes all past history to be in alignment with their 21st century ideology. Perhaps they missed the fact that one major reason West's work is so powerful is that, unlike many other writers, she is not afraid of taking a stance and being open and honest with her opinions rather than biting her tongue so as not to potentially offended anyone. Kirkesque (talk) 01:54, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

I hope in the decade since you wrote this nonsense, you have become a more intelligent and thoughtful individual. Given you're a Wikipedia editor, that is rather doubtful. But one can hope. 2603:7080:8040:EE00:0:0:0:1 (talk) 22:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

I realize I'm coming to this discussion belatedly, Kirkesque, but I suggest you read "unsigned's" comment again, more carefully. With all due respect, you seem to have completely missed the point.Jcejhay (talk) 12:29, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Mention in the press

This article was mentioned in the press. [1] -- Stbalbach 13:53, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Copyright problem

This article has been reverted by a bot to this version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 13:35, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Bookman

I disambiguated the link to The Bookman based on this Google Books result. Not sure why it was sitting around for almost two years when a simple Google search would have cleared it up. --Closedmouth (talk) 09:45, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

This article does not have a neutral point of view.

Every single paragraph gushes with favourable intensifiers, like "outstanding" this or outstanding that. Wikipedia isn't supposed to use weasel worded stuff in articles--unless the vast majority of secondary sources all specifically describe something as outstanding, and specifically, use the word outstanding. The whole thing reminds me of the worst sort of brittanica article.2601:7:6580:5E3:F9ED:E455:A019:4152 (talk) 09:26, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

a source for more NPOV: Adrian Hastings, Special peoples, pdf. Greetings -Big Virgil (talk) 17:53, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

The article should be moved to Rebecca West (writer)

On second thought, this article should be moved to Rebecca West (writer) rather than just having the hatnote, as the Ibsen play from which she took her pen name is far better known. --Msbmt (talk) 01:35, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Rebecca West. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110611062216/http://www.tbcs.org.uk/rebecca_west.htm to http://www.tbcs.org.uk/rebecca_west.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110203041310/http://pearhousepress.com/rebeccawest.html to http://www.pearhousepress.com/rebeccawest.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091129051120/http://modernism.research.yale.edu/wiki/index.php/Rebecca_West to http://modernism.research.yale.edu/wiki/index.php/Rebecca_West

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:03, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Um... H.G. Wells?

Anybody?

correct spelling of subjects name

I am the grandson of Rebecca West. In my youth writing Christmas present thank-you letters to my grandmother I was admonished by my father Anthony West not to miss spell her name. The correct spelling was CECILY Andrews, not under any circumstances the offensive and incorrect CICILY OR CICELY. I might also add that verification of her correct name comes from Buckingham Palace awarding her the title of Dame under her correct name. At the risk of offending some experts on the subject it is perhaps important to to be able to spell your subjects name correctly to avoid the risk of appearing to know little or nothing about the subject of your expertise. 860-464-0233Edmundanthonypantherwest (talk) 20:56, 5 August 2024 (UTC)