Talk:Rebel Heart/GA1
(Redirected from Talk:Rebel Heart (Madonna album)/GA1)
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Calvin999 in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 18:03, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
- Returning some connection issues
- Link studio album
- Should Boy Toy and Live Nation be included in the lead?
- She teased by uploading pictures → Teased what?
- with a number → with a large number
- posed problem → typo
- and direction → and creative direction
- Thematically Rebel Heart → Comma after Thematically
- available for download. → available for download immediately.
- Police investigation led → A police investigation led
- Link Israeli
- and the leaks. → and leaking some of the tracks.
- Further promotion happened from the → It was further promoted by the
- started from September → started in September
- and continued till March → and concluded in March
- 2016 through North → 2016, visiting North
- It debuted at number two → It peaked at number two
- faced problem in → encountered problems in
- So the record → Reads slightly fan-y.
- There isn't any commentary for the Physical album artwork, so I don't think it should be included in the info box.
- Calvin999 I have already nominated it for deletion, see here, but as you know, that nominator goes on arguing. —IB [ Poke ] 10:09, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Next day she → The next day, she
- as well as confirmed → as well as confirming
- all the three tracks → Hold Tight didn't, so this needs to be clarified.
- Digital Spy shouldn't be in italics in the refs.
- Some have just work, like DS, others have work and publisher, like MTV News/Viacom. I thought that only a work parameter was needed now?
- Outcome
On hold for 7 days. — Calvin999 09:06, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Calvin999: some wonderful copy edits were recently done by User:Twofinger. Would you like to take a look at the article again to see if you have any further comments? If not, I will address the comments you posted above. Just making sure thats all. :) —IB [ Poke ] 15:30, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- IB, Calvin999 was blocked for one month on April 22, and three appeals have thus far proved unavailing. I'd like to suggest that you address those comments now. If Calvin999 is still not unblocked by the time you're done, we can see whether a new reviewer can be found to take over the review. Or, if you prefer, you can wait up to a month for him to be unblocked. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:01, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- I have received an email from the reviewer, who quoted, "if they could just go over the final issues, then they are passable." FrB.TG (talk) 15:00, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- Okay sure, I will go through them now, even I received an email also, Calvin999 has been explained. —IB [ Poke ] 15:06, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- FrB.TG, all yours. —IB [ Poke ] 21:59, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- FrB.TG, thanks for being willing to take over as the reviewer. Please note that you cannot pass the article as a proxy for Calvin999, based on an offsite communication between you. If you pass it, it's because you as reviewer have checked for yourself not only that all the issues raised above have been addressed, but that you believe the article currently meets the GA criteria in all categories. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Yes I agree with BlueMoonset, so FrB.TG if possible could you see the article with fresh eyes and not based on Calvin999's review comments? —IB [ Poke ] 09:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- BlueMoonset I don't think anyone is willing to take this article up. What can we do? —IB [ Poke ] 14:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- IB, I hate to have to say this, but I think your best bet is to wait for Calvin999's block to expire in 13 days, at which point he can return to finish the review. Given the current rate of GANs being picked up for reviewing, even with the GA Cup in full swing, it would probably be several weeks before a new reviewer would pick it up. I'm sorry you're having to wait, but I don't see any way to speed the process. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Okay thanks for the detailed response BlueMoonset, its fine I will wait. There's no hurry with the article. —IB [ Poke ] 15:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- IB, I hate to have to say this, but I think your best bet is to wait for Calvin999's block to expire in 13 days, at which point he can return to finish the review. Given the current rate of GANs being picked up for reviewing, even with the GA Cup in full swing, it would probably be several weeks before a new reviewer would pick it up. I'm sorry you're having to wait, but I don't see any way to speed the process. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- BlueMoonset I don't think anyone is willing to take this article up. What can we do? —IB [ Poke ] 14:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yes I agree with BlueMoonset, so FrB.TG if possible could you see the article with fresh eyes and not based on Calvin999's review comments? —IB [ Poke ] 09:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- FrB.TG, thanks for being willing to take over as the reviewer. Please note that you cannot pass the article as a proxy for Calvin999, based on an offsite communication between you. If you pass it, it's because you as reviewer have checked for yourself not only that all the issues raised above have been addressed, but that you believe the article currently meets the GA criteria in all categories. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- FrB.TG, all yours. —IB [ Poke ] 21:59, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Okay sure, I will go through them now, even I received an email also, Calvin999 has been explained. —IB [ Poke ] 15:06, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- I have received an email from the reviewer, who quoted, "if they could just go over the final issues, then they are passable." FrB.TG (talk) 15:00, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- IB, Calvin999 was blocked for one month on April 22, and three appeals have thus far proved unavailing. I'd like to suggest that you address those comments now. If Calvin999 is still not unblocked by the time you're done, we can see whether a new reviewer can be found to take over the review. Or, if you prefer, you can wait up to a month for him to be unblocked. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:01, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
I've gone through and checked and every has been done. Passing. — Calvin999 16:19, 16 May 2016 (UTC)