Description of Activity

edit

The description of the activity of the RecBCD is sparse and in need of expansion. For instance, both strands are cut until the holoenzyme reaches the chi site. Then, RecD is inactivated. RegiG (talk) 20:33, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I am not an expert on enzymes and I have expanded this article to the limits of my knowledge. I would encourage you to be bold and expand this article further. Cheers. Boghog2 (talk) 10:03, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
After reading the Nature paper, it is clear that there were inaccuracies in the function section. I have revised this section and hopefully it now contains a more accurate description of the mechanism. Boghog2 (talk) 17:40, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, BogHog! I'm glad the article is here. Perhaps once I feel I have a better grasp of the activity, I can add to it. I am looking forward to reading your changes. RegiG (talk) 21:59, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:RecBCD recomb model.tif Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:RecBCD recomb model.tif, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:RecBCD recomb model.tif)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:48, 27 March 2012 (UTC)Reply