edit

Everyone, the link may be ok; check it out. I first removed it because it had been removed as spam on another article. See my talk page for his justification. Carl.bunderson (talk) 04:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Linking to one of thousands of recipe websites from a general article like this (and Restaurant) is spamming. It's not a website about "what a recipe is", it's just another site with recipes on it. I'm staying out of this from here on in, but this is not an appropriate link. - Special-T (talk) 04:48, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
I saw your comment on his talk page after posting that, and you are right. I've been in the same situation before with specificity of links, and I just hadn't been thinking about this one from that standpoint. So I wouldn't say there is reason for you to stay out of it; I'll continue removing it now. Carl.bunderson (talk) 04:49, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
So what's the final verdict? I guess the link I provided is too general for this topic? I just don't see how you can judge which links stay or go... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gtg228r (talkcontribs) 05:30, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well my 2¢ is that it's not ok here, but is on something such as Vegetarian cuisine. See WP:EL for more on guidelines about what to, and not to, link. Carl.bunderson (talk) 05:40, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Definitely wouldn't think it would be suited here, good idea about Vegetarian cuisine. Wexcan  Talk  05:44, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Ok, thanks for your help! appreciate it Gtg228r (talk) 05:57, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

I'm removing nearly all of the external links, since they are merely links to websites providing lots of recipes. 1- There are (tens of?) thousands of such sites, and listing a few here in a general encyclopedia article is arbitrary; 2- A Google search for the word recipe would turn up pages of listings like this. Links here don't add to the article; 3- These are not sites with information about recipes, they're just recipes. If there's a good reason to restore any of these, go ahead, but it seems pretty clear that these are not good external links that add value to an encyclopedia article. - Special-T (talk) 17:23, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've removed the new link to a "recipie Wikia" page as I feel it's solely to promote the Wikia or, at the very least, doesn't add much to the page itself. -Corestrike (talk) 07:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Enunciation advice

edit

"Ress-i-pee"? That's a bit too amateurish, why not use proper symbols? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.91.90.219 (talk) 22:55, 9 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've removed the pronunciation. Carl.bunderson (talk) 21:37, 12 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Recipes in Ancient Egypt

edit

Phrase: "There are ancient Egyptians hieroglyphics depicting the preparation of food" refered to Encyclopedia of Food and Culture, vol. 1, p. 558. But at this page is no mention about this, only: "Records from China and Egypt show that fowl were domesticated and laying eggs for human consumption around 1400 B.C.E.". Gytha (talk) 10:47, 23 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Writ 2 - Academic Writing

edit

  This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 September 2024 and 13 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bennyxgmo (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Bennyxgmo (talk) 20:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply