Talk:Recognition of Native American sacred sites in the United States

Lead structure

This article is well laid out, but the lead is a little essay-like. You should check out WP:LEAD for a description of the ideal structure for the lead section.--Carwil (talk) 19:41, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Reviewer Suggestions

I think the article was very well organized and informative. I think the only thing that could possibly enhance it would be to provide some examples of specific instances where native sacred sites were vulnerable and how U.S. law helped (or failed to help) protect such sites. This would just help the reader be able to relate the idea of sacred sites protection to actual events rather than read the specifics of the law. Other than that, I think it's a great article on a really important topic. Job well done! - Msellick (talk) 21:48, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks I'll try to include that in time. I thought about doing that, but since my paper is on the same topic but with specific instances, I was concerned about rewriting it. However, I think that you make a valid point. I guess I was just didn't put a great importance to it. Sarahg.2009 (talk) 02:39, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

This info needs an update now that the usda forest service has started work on their sacred sites policy recommendations and the interagency mou on sacred site is moving folks toward better responses. Take a look at the forest service office of tribal relations pages. ----

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Hunter College, CUNY supported by WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:55, 2 January 2023 (UTC)