Talk:Recorder (musical instrument)/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:23, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

In order to uphold the quality of Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of July 18, 2009, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GAR.

Major contributors and projects notified.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose):

   b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references):

   • Large sections are unreferenced which is grounds to de-list immediately. References that are there are often unverifiable, for books list author/editor, pages numbers, etc. use cite books template. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

   b (citations to reliable sources):

   • Quiet a few personal website in there, please read WP:RS. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

   c (OR):

   • ???? I don't know until references are found. Jezhotwells (talk)

3. It is broad in its scope.

   a (major aspects):

   b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):

   • File:Altorecorder.jpg ⋅can't be pd-old as it it is a modern photograph. Likewise File:Tenorrecorder.jpg; File:Numbered finger holes.jpg# is downloaded form where?;

   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   • Some images are uncaptioned.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   • Delist. A loty of issues to be fixed. please bring to WP:GAN when fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Hey - this discussion is of an appallingly low standard itself! Claim that long sections are unreferenced - whichsections? You don't tell us. "Quite a few personal websites"? List them, please, because i can't see ANY! Downgrading for good reason is fine, but this is just ridiculous.

OldTownAdge (talk) 12:06, 13 March 2010 (UTC)