Untitled

edit

Whose disc is it? — Pt (T) 00:14, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I've got a copy. FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 18:41, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Motley-Crue-Red-White-Crue.jpg

edit
 

Image:Motley-Crue-Red-White-Crue.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:37, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Red, White & Crüe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:26, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

"Red, White and Cruee" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Red, White and Cruee. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 26#Red, White and Cruee until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 04:14, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Red, White And Cruee" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Red, White And Cruee and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 5#Red, White And Cruee until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 23:38, 5 November 2022 (UTC)Reply