Talk:Red Ensign of Singapore

"Over design"?

Hi, Zscout370, good job creating this article (and, yes, I guess it deserves a "B" rating!). I note that the lead states: "The over design of the ensign is a modification of the national flag ..." What is an "over design"? Is this a special vexillological term? If not, I think it needs rephrasing because it doesn't make much sense in ordinary English. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 19:55, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

I was typing this very late in the evening (maybe 1 or 2 am), and I was supposed to say "overall." User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 21:01, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Ah! :-) — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 05:05, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Image of ensign in use

Have found a great photograph of the Red Ensign in use at Flickr. Hopefully the uploader will license it to us. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 09:17, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

I been also trying to find out if I can purchase an ensign to take photos. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 03:47, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

You are pretty hardcore, aren't you? ;-) Regarding the photograph, the Flickr uploader retagged it with a "non-commercial" tag, so I've just sent an e-mail explaining to him why it needs to be tagged with either CC-BY-2.0 or CC-BY-SA-2.0. I hope he agrees! At some stage I will have to pop down to the National University of Singapore to do some extra research about the legislation relating to the ensign. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 04:15, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Gives me something else to put in the collection lah. Plus, I want to measure the flag itself, since I notice in the photo that flag seems to be more of a 2:3 ratio, even with the tears at the fly. I tried to email the flag makers, but the guys won't respond. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 04:23, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I noticed the difference in ratio too. But I wouldn't place too much weight on a single case. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 05:36, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

True, but would improve better on what I previously had. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 05:41, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Whoops, accidentally overwrote your cropped version of the photograph with a higher-quality version of the original one provided by the Flickr uploader. I've created a separate file called "RedEnsignofSingapore-20051226-cropped.jpg"; feel free to recrop the higher-quality image and upload it over "RedEnsignofSingapore-20051226-cropped.jpg". — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 15:42, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Fine by me, I am using the cropped version of the photo in the article now. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 02:12, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Red Ensign of Singapore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110525095447/http://www.mpa.gov.sg/sites/port_and_shipping/circulars_and_notices/shipping_circulars_detail.page?filename=mc99-13.xml to http://www.mpa.gov.sg/sites/port_and_shipping/circulars_and_notices/shipping_circulars_detail.page?filename=mc99-13.xml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120213115405/http://www.mpa.gov.sg/sites/circulars_and_notices/images/shipping_circulars/mc99-13b.gif to http://www.mpa.gov.sg/sites/circulars_and_notices/images/shipping_circulars/mc99-13b.gif

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:46, 15 October 2017 (UTC)