Talk:Red Hot Catholic Love

Untitled

I removed the word 'pissed' in two places. See Wikipedia:Profanity. Even though the South Park episodes use profanity, we shouldn't use them in plot synopses unless we are directly quoting the show. Phantom784 02:47, August 25, 2005 (UTC)

Introduction

"In the DVD commentary for this episode, Stone and Parker refer to their irritation towards arguments from more socially liberal/atheistic/secular minded types of people, as well as socially religious conservatives, who are the usual targets for their gags."

Why is this here? I'm not sure why this needs to be on the page, at all, but if so, then it should probably be relegated to a 'DVD Extras' or '6th Season Commentary section.' It doesn't seem relevant for the general outline. 71.127.95.182 09:58, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

It was originally in a trivia section, which needed to be removed, so that was where I moved the text to. Thedarxide 08:04, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

I think it should be redirected.

This episode article is comprised mainly of plot. It should be merged with the main list, and have a few short paragraphs on the plot given. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 02:49, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Ummm are you saying we should not include the plot in the article? :confused: It's a great episode and deserves it's own article like every other episode. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Couldn't think of a decent username (talk • contribs) 09:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I think this is the most ridiculous idea since people wanted to delete the "Cleveland Shootings" because no one got hurt physically. This episode deserves its own article like every other episode. No one should have to go to the episode list or any other place to find information on this episode. So what, this article is mainly for the plot. Look at chemicals that have their own article. They're not large. You don't need to write a book to describe, "A pencil is what you use to write."--Xxhopingtearsxx (talk) 01:06, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Redirect

I have redirected this episode because it was comprised mainly of plot, and had little to no outside information on the episode. The workers who sculpted the article's efforts were not in vain, though. The episode's contents now exist identically in South Park Wiki. Just so you know. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 07:07, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Phantom Of Liberty

Is similarity to another film really enough to add it in? I don't even see the similarity anyway...there's poop in both scenes, that's it. Lots42 (talk) 17:34, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

TV Edit

Just watched this on the CW and they edited out the scenes where they crap out of the mouth and included a text cut scene saying something like "This scene of (name) crapping out of his mouth has been removed for your viewing pleasure." Should be mentioned in article since edits to other episodes are mentioned. 68.44.213.63 (talk) 08:07, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

It was in the article, it was removed by an editor because they'd "never seen it" Thedarxide (talk) 09:02, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Red Hot Catholic Love. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110612151952/http://news.softpedia.com/news/The-039-South-Park-039-Episodes-that-Changed-the-World-36019.shtml to http://news.softpedia.com/news/The-039-South-Park-039-Episodes-that-Changed-the-World-36019.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:51, 7 January 2018 (UTC)