Talk:Red River (manga)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Review
editEventually, a reception section is needed. Towards compiling information for it, here's a review of volume 1. —Quasirandom (talk) 20:03, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Multiple issues
editI noticed that this article has been tagged for improvement. Three were tagged here and the fourth (too short, referring to expanding the introductory paragraph) was added as they were consolidated here. Since this tag links to the talk page, I thought it would be appropriate to create a section addressing Collectonian's suggestions. So here are some subtopics for them. Tyciol (talk) 19:22, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Needs more references+sources
editCurrently I see two. How many do we need? Tyciol (talk) 19:22, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Plot summary too long
editI am guessing this issue may have been resolved since August since I don't even see a plot summary anymore... Tyciol (talk) 19:22, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Needs general cleanup for quality
editThis is of course, an ongoing battle with all articles. I deleted some spacing but beyond that I am not really sure what needs cleaned, suggestions? Tyciol (talk) 19:22, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Expand lead section
editTo me, this is a bit confusing, to me it looks like the plot summary is incorporated into the lead section. Perhaps it was small before, but after incorporating the remnants of plot summary into it, it is big enough now? I am not really sure, comments on the size? Tyciol (talk) 19:22, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Red River (manga). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091230133647/http://viz.com/news/newsroom/2004/02_titles.php to http://viz.com/news/newsroom/2004/02_titles.php
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.viz.com/products/products.php?product_id=7606
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:51, 25 December 2017 (UTC)