Talk:Redhill, Somerset

Untitled

"This article or section is not written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Please improve it ..." could whoever wrote that please give me something mroe specific? I don't want tohe article to be deleted - it's dear to me, but i don't, at present, have the time to re-write it.

I didn't write that comment but have now looked at the article in some depth & attempted to revise it to bring it more into line with the Manual of Style. I have attempted to remove some of the phrases which were not from a Neutral point of view and some of the colloquialisms. In some sections there is still to much detail including the names of local farmers etc which, while adding "colour" do not really sit well in an encyclopedia. There is also a fair amount of repetition between the history sections. Further information would be useful about the village today (eg population, employment) and perhaps the other areas detailed in Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements.— Rod ^talk 20:14, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

One thing I think should happen here is for the history section to be removed to it's own page, and a summary left here. See Wikipedia:WikiProject_UK_geography/How_to_write_about_settlements#History. Some material might also stay here under Landmarks and Economy etc. Derek Andrews 01:01, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Redhill, Somerset. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080130105206/http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1995/Uksi_19950493_en_1.htm to http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1995/Uksi_19950493_en_1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:17, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Redhill, Somerset. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071001003807/http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10025515&c_id=10001043 to http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10025515&c_id=10001043

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:30, 20 May 2017 (UTC)