Talk:Reduction to practice
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Jerzy in topic Not a worthless article, but
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Not a worthless article, but
editThe accompanying article is not IMO worthless, but it's far from adequate. For instance,
- the reduction to practice is a concept meaning the embodiment of the concept of an invention
evolved from two sentences that only used "concept" once, but the confusing distraction provided by (almost explicitly) two levels of abstraction is a screamed warning that the article has been floundering for probably the whole of its 10-year history.
--Jerzy•t 02:19, 17 March 2015 (UTC)