 | This article was nominated for deletion on 22 November 2021. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Reed Exhibitions redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. |
Notability
editThe subject of this article appears to have little to no significant coverage in reliable, independent, secondary sources – existing media coverage appears to be essentially all incidental/promotional coverage – nothing that would satisfy WP:NOTNEWS and WP:PROMO. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 02:24, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
ReedPOP
editI've again removed an unsourced list of the company's products and/or services. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information or an extension of an organization's website. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 02:57, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Technical updates
editI've just made a few edits to the page. Just factual edits (retired the chairman, and updated old figures which still referred to the old parent company Reed Elsevier). There shouldn't be anything contentious there so I've gone ahead and made the changes myself - I work for parent company RELX Group, so try not to make changes to these pages where possible. Please let me know if you disagree. Thanks Ryoba (talk) 13:26, 15 November 2018 (UTC)