Talk:Referee in Bankruptcy

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Unconstitutionality of the Bankruptcy Act of 1978

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The "bankruptcy judges" who replaced the referees under this act were termed "judges" but were not appointed for life and hence were not actual federal court judges according to the SCOTUS holding in Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., which necessitated considerable changes. Should this not be at least mentioned in passing in this article and/or linked to? 166.152.221.57 (talk) 02:08, 24 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

That's not exactly what the Supreme Court ruled in the Northern Pipeline case. U.S. bankruptcy judges are "actual federal judges," but they are not "Article III" judges. Famspear (talk) 16:00, 13 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic