This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article was accepted on 14 February 2013 by reviewer Freebirds (talk·contribs).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
"This article needs attention from an expert in Probability"? Well, I am an expert in probability (and stochastic processes). So, what is the need? The article is correct, as far as I see. And its author (originator) is an expert himself. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 18:06, 8 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for stopping by. I don't see the need for either the expert-needed tag or the technical tag. The article has been improved since those tags were placed (disclaimer: some of those were my improvements) and I don't think they are needed anymore. So I removed both tags. --Mark viking (talk) 18:28, 8 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
