Talk:Reformism (historical)

Sociology: Social Movements Mid‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the social movements task force.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Omissions

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This page is missing a lot of significant reform movements.Dfeuer 00:12, 12 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Agreed! I am attempting to fill in some of these, and provide some source citations as I go. Please help, as this is a big subject and an area of widespread ignorance!Fconaway 03:03, 7 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Title

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Shouldn't this have the title, Reform Movements? Yes it definitely should i agree 100% Fconaway 03:03, 7 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Search fields error?

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Although the title of this article certainly appears to be "Reform movement", if you search with the exact search field "Social reform movement 1848" on Google, with Verbatim results, it comes up with "It was Social Reform Movement" as the link text, where the title of the article normally appears.

this may well be a minor mistake and not much to fret over, but I wanted to make sure that if it by any chance wasn't, it would be noted.

Tlongoria2 (talk) 16:29, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Also, if it's 1840-1830 on the 2nd heading under ToC, wouldn't that mean that Birds of America is a relevant but unrelated detail for the bullet-list section Science?

Tlongoria2 (talk) 16:33, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic