Talk:Refuse & Resist!
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Refuse & Resist! article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Problems of POV, lack of neutrality
editThis article is absurdly POV—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.60.211.14 (talk • contribs) 00:03, 6 September 2005.
- Not to mention sloppy. Feel free to edit it and clean up the POV, grammar, and missing links. Mycota 02:47, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- I don't see anything NPOV. Seems to follow what the group preaches pretty well. I think the group is so small that no criticisms exist of the group itself. However, the issues they preach about are pretty controversial. Do criticisms have to exist for every article on Wikipedia? I say we leave the neutrality tag for another month and then after that it gets removed. --Thesilence 14:47, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Removal of a link
editI removed the link to Discover the Networks. Who put that up? DTN is a project of reactionary David Horowitz, a rightwing shill who accuses anyone even remotely left of "treason," etc. Nobody on a site like Wikipedia should be citing such a group as a "source" for anything. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.147.222.166 (talk) 02:52, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Templates; missing citations; lack of neutrality
editAdded the templates due to the problems discussed above. This article appears to be more of an advertisement for the organization than a neutral article about it. It lacks neutral reliable and verifiable citations to sources not published by the organization itself and it appears to be plagiarized from either some of the website's publications or other unacknowledged sources of information. --NYScholar (talk) 23:03, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Restored (and updated) the templates. --NYScholar (talk) 18:08, 15 March 2009 (UTC) Many of the items used as sources have no URLs given and are unverifiable; their reliability is dubious. --NYScholar (talk) 18:10, 15 March 2009 (UTC)