Talk:Regino C. Hermosisima Jr.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Regino C. Hermosisima Jr. article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
untitled
editThe Filipino Magistrate who Changed History
editFrom Banilad Cebu, Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr. is the only justice in the world who incarcerated the accused who were already acquitted by final judgment by the Marcos Sandiganbayan, thereby, making history in world criminal jurisprudence on double jeopardy. His ponencia is now 24 years old final and the 14 accused had been in jail for 24 years.
2 Rare Handwritten and Signed Letters of Justice Hermosisima, Jr.
editThese 2 letters are the only LETTERS handwritten by Justice Hermosisima,Jr.,and NONE can be found elsewhere, so I uploaded these to show the very elaborate handwriting and signature of this most powerful jurist.
POV Check
editSpecifically, the "2 guns" section reads as if it has an agenda. Beeblbrox (talk) 14:52, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Due to inexperience in editing, I merely copied the titles of the inquirer lead report on the 2 guns. Why? Since, these 2 guns, legally speaking really, were the cream of cream of the case, considering the 2,000 exhibits (tons or truckloads of). Usually, we editors cannot describe best our edit, except by copying verbatim some parts of the titles of the reports. Often, journalists who are specialists on communication deprive us editors of using better words from thesaurus. Copyright laws would stop us from copying the entire reports verbatim, so we use our own words. A cursory perusal of the article reveals that as creator and editor or contributor, I merely used my own words to comply with copyright laws. Anyway, borrowing the "2 guns" from Inquirer.net[1] might even be a copyright violation rather than violation of neutrality or POV. But I could not find better words to portray the legal angle of the case, since the guns are part and parcel of corpus delicti to prove the body of the crime. For legal experts and magistrates, using or borrowing these 2 words from Inquirer.net is good edit, since there could be no better words to edit the section. - --Florentino floro (talk) 09:10, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Removal of POV tag
editI am removing an old neutrality tag from this page.The discussion is no longer active per the instructions at Template:POV:
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
- There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
- It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
- In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag. —¿philoserf? (talk) 16:26, 4 February 2022 (UTC)