Talk:Regional Force Surveillance Units

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Regional Force Surveillance Units article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: South Pacific

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force

Australia: Northern Territory / Western Australia / Military history Low‑importance

	Australia portal Regional Force Surveillance Units is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Northern Territory (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia, or the Northern Territory Library.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Why are the RFSUs considered unique if the Canadian Rangers perform the same task, only in the north of Canada, which by the way covers much more area than the RFSUs have to cover?--99.250.177.248 (talk) 00:52, 5 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Northern Australia & Northern Canada are both very large areas with relatively small populations & a harsh environment. Both the RFSU's & Canadian Rangers have relatively large indiginious memberships & being reservists, their memberships are locals bringing local knowledge & relationships. However the RFSUs are much more like ordinary army recon units & are trained & armed as such. They often don't want to be seen & are quite capable of independant military action if required. The Canadian Ranges with their bright red shirts & bolt action rifles are designed more to be seen, to patrol in areas few others can & to support general army units when they operate in the area. In some ways the Rangers are more like the armed native (& non native) guides of colonial days but with a more formal framework. 1.149.16.229 (talk) 14:06, 25 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed Merger

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I propose the contents of the Regional Force Surveillance Units page should be merged into the page Regional Force Surveillance Group. The content is clearly the same. I can't see a use for two separate articles. --TinTin (talk) 01:40, 21 November 2018 (UTC) Discussion in Talk:Regional Force Surveillance Group --TinTin (talk) 23:40, 21 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic