Talk:Relativistic particle

rm of "Oh my god particle"

Really, I don't think that it is INTRINSICALLY related to the direction this particle should be going, so it's also a means of trimming down the list as it's quite large now. There are links, but I think that it's a better idea to make sure this article is maintained to stop the list from just ending up as a huge list of particles which are specified or work noticeably within the confines of special or general relativity or implications thereof. The page redirected, and it was just a bad idea for an addition. Uxorion 19:55, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Relativistic particle/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Luqmaanmm 15:23, 8 March 2007 (UTC) I don't agree on the whole article because it goes against the basic principle of physics. I am preparing new article to replace this one. I challenge the author and physicists to debate on this concept. Luqmaanmm 15:23, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Last edited at 15:23, 8 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 04:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

LaTex not rendering when using MS-Edge.

I don't think it is this page only...in fact after checking, it is any page. I've noticed this happens in MSEdge on and off, and there does not appear to be a pattern or obvious (to me anyway) reason. For example, on this page, equation (1) appears as

$ E^{2}=(p{\textrm {c}})^{2}+\left(m_{0}{\textrm {c}}^{2}\right)^{2}\, $

I tried different "tricks" in the editor, but nothing appears to work.

Chrome and Firefox do not have this problem (this is probably also true for other html readers, but have not checked. Joe wiki eds (talk) 00:10, 29 May 2024 (UTC)