Talk:Religion and authoritarianism

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 22:03, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that conventional religion is positively correlated with authoritarianism? Source: https://daily.jstor.org/what-links-religion-and-authoritarianism/ https://www.jstor.org/stable/1386769

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Second Battle of Oituz

Created by Buidhe (talk). Self-nominated at 15:13, 28 August 2020 (UTC).

• Article is new enough (mainspaced on 28 August) and long enough (2566 characters of prose).
• Article is written in NPOV and contains sufficient inline citations to high-quality sources.
• Only close matches from Earwig are presented as quotations and correctly cited in the article. [1]
• Hook is properly formatted, sufficiently interesting, supported by sources, and of appropriate length.
• QPQ is done.
• Good to go. Armadillopteryx 22:58, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

photo

I'm wondering about the photo. Is that neutral? I almost think we need a source connecting it to this topic. It's got a source that sails right up next to the topic, but I think it could be SYNTH and a POV issue. —valereee (talk) 17:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Which photo? One was added while I was away (t · c) buidhe 01:10, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

• The trump photo. --evrik ^(talk) 01:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

  The source clearly discusses the incident in terms of the general connection between religion and authoritarianism. (t · c) buidhe 02:56, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

• Perhaps, but its a little over the top, especially for a DYK. In fact, now that you have stripped everything placed in the article to try and broaden the focus - the image seems very POV. --evrik ^(talk) 03:03, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

  I did not strip any sourced content from the article. WP:V applies to all content in mainspace, including see also sections; adding certain religions without any source does indicate that there is a connection between that religion and authoritarianism and contravenes the need for verifiability. Feel free to remove the Trump image if you don't agree with it. However, the Franco image is more problematic IMO because there is no source for it. (t · c) buidhe 03:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

• I added a source to the image. There is a long discussion on Franco and the church at Franco with Catholic Church. You did strip the content out ... the See Also section fit in per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Layout#"See_also"_section. You seem to have a vision for this article. Good luck with that. --evrik ^(talk) 04:11, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

  Evrik, I don't have access to the source you added. What does it cite? That the photograph shows Franco with Catholic dignitaries in 1946? Or that there is some connection between Franco, religion, and authoritarianism? (t · c) buidhe 04:15, 15 September 2020 (UTC)