Talk:Religion in Tibet

Hello, I'm Amigao. I noticed that you recently removed content from Religion in Tibet without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Amigao (talk) 10:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Untitled

If you, sir, feel that my writing has greatly embarrassed you or gone against your position. Or if you feel that my write-up is nowhere near as good as some of the previous edits, I can stay away from your perspective and sphere of influence (I do feel that most of the content dealing with Tibet and China is very outdated and biased, and I do believe that you see a qualitative difference in the entries before and after the write-up). TinaLees-Jones (talk) 13:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Regarding the Tibetan religion, first of all the history of Tibetan religion has to be originated from the Bön, under the impression of the historical formation of Nepal and China's inland, and the formation of the more distinctive Tibetan Buddhism. It is on this basis that the construction is clearer. This theory can be obtained both from Chinese and Indian books, but from American and British writings, more emphasis is placed on the religious influence carried out since the British colonization of Tibet after 1900, and the scope of this influence is only confronted with the upper echelons of the Tibetan regime. TinaLees-Jones (talk) 13:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Those are topics to be raised in Talk:Religion in Tibet, not here. - Amigao (talk) 17:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

This is a logical problem that exists in the structural framework of this entry, so that it appears that Tibet "suddenly" has a self-special Buddhist culture and tradition. And the pattern seems to be exactly the same at both the civil and bureaucratic levels (if you read a bit of history, it will be clearer that this is a false proposition). TinaLees-Jones (talk) 13:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

As for the four different sects of Tibetan Buddhism (we don't usually call them TRADITIONS, but rather sects). Understanding the differences and contradictions between the different sects is the only way to better explain why the Dalai Lama would be one of them (and his departure would only take some of the followers with him - not the vast majority), but his influence is still there. As for these sources, I am not sure why you deleted them. TinaLees-Jones (talk) 13:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Also on the question of whether Hinduism exists in Tibet, the answer is very few, especially fewer among the civilian population. If you see the geographic differences, the pattern of Indian migration into Tibet, from the common people (not the military), is just through Nepal. And Nepal is a typical Theravada sect of Buddhism, and there are still differences with Tibetan Buddhism. So there are natural attributes to this Hinduism into Tibet, this religious compartmentalization, and I don't know why you insist on staying - If you have a specific interest to claim, you can also state it directly or metaphorically. TinaLees-Jones (talk) 13:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)