Talk:Religious literacy

Criticisms

The article should maybe include valuable criticism of the concept of religious literacy. From an evolutionary psychological or anthropological perpsective, there is no such thing as religious literacy, since the majority of primitive religions did not really have scriptures and stuck to their changing rituals. The same criticism could be applied to the notion of philosophical literacy, since philosophers are often revising their notions of accepted wisdom. However, the article could still include useful sociological material about how people from a mainstream religious background have knowlededge of their own scriptures, or how they understand the traditions and views of people of other religious backgrounds. ADM (talk) 15:29, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

That does'nt make any sense. Correct me if i'm wrong, but did the above commentator confuse "literacy" with "literalism"? Quote from the article: "Religious literacy is the knowledge of, and ability to understand, religion." If anything, the articles description is too abstract to opt for "criticism" on, since the meaning of "the ability to understand religion" would ofcourse be impossible to define in a precise way that is unbiased and objective. To say that "an evolutionary psychological or anthropological perspective" does not make any sence if the commentator actually did not confuse those terms. --Justathought (talk) 15:35, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://rlp.hds.harvard.edu/definition-religious-literacy, http://rlp.hds.harvard.edu/publications/guidelines-teaching-about-religion-k-12-public-schools-united-states, http://worldhistoryconnected.press.illinois.edu/4.1/moore.html and probably several more. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Anomie⚔ 11:02, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

{OTRS Pending}

Adding information from the Religious Literacy Project's webpage to the "religious literacy" wikipage. {OTRS PENDING} R.L.Robison (talk) 00:44, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Writing and Literacy in the Digital Age

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 January 2023 and 5 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Trobins6 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Northsideknights (talk) 16:58, 16 April 2023 (UTC)