This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The title seems to me very incorrect, considering that as far as you can tell from the life of Constantius II, he was a pagan-christian syncretic and quite tolerant, so more than anti-pagan politics, I think it should be treated as a reform of paganism, since at that historical moment, at least the traditional Roman religion was not like in the time of Augustus. Even among the pagans themselves there were groups opposed to sacrifices and divination because they were considered anti-rational, reaching the extreme that there should be no temples, this arose within Neoplatonism, since it was believed that to contact the Logos there was no need for temples and such opulence, but the training of the soul and mind. 84.78.240.150 (talk) 11:17, 23 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
