This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The article at the moment is mainly about Pilgrimage, to which Spiritual tourism already redirects (rightly or wrongly: maybe it should point here instead). 'Religious tourism' could plainly also redirect there, but there seems to be an implicit distinction (which can perhaps be defended from reliable sources) between pilgrimage (travelling purely for religious reasons) and tourism (going to see the religious architecture, art, spectacle, or festival, even if one is not religious). If that is what the article is trying to do, all the pilgrimage aspects should be moved out of the article, or boldly placed in a section with a 'Main' link to 'Pilgrimage' and a brief explanation there that pilgrimage isn't tourism, though it shares some elements (travel, accommodation) with it, as its goal is entirely different. The lack of sources is, as always, a serious problem, as is the (resulting) lack of coherent narrative. The article needs a near-total rewrite. A related article, Christian tourism, suffers from the same lack of clarity: is pilgrimage tourism or not? These should probably be dealt with together. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:55, 2 December 2019 (UTC)Reply