Talk:Relocation of Wimbledon F.C. to Milton Keynes/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Notjamesbond (talk) 17:17, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

This article was mainly there but needed some help to tidy up in order to achieve GA status. Any issues that I came across I tried to rectify as they were generally only small.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   some sections that seemed to be partisan, tidied up to make more generic

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   I personally would like to see the intro referenced but i understand that this is an optional requirement.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   some really good referencing, some that couldn't be verified as in books and subscriptions needed but use of notes was good and I would find it unlikely that any of the sources were unreliabl

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   there were some sections that I was uncomfortable with but these were amended

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: