Talk:Renfrew Ferry

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Scotland: Transport in Scotland Mid‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Transport in Scotland.

Proposed merger

Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

An editor has proposed the merger of the Amfibus article into this one.

Oppose It is not certain yet that the Amfibus will enter service. Should it do so, it cannot be seen as a direct replacement of the ferry, as it will also serve places that the ferry never did. Mjroots (talk) 22:24, 9 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Oppose This Amfibus is a worldwide unique kind of transport and it is to be the first usage of such bus-boat as line transport vehicle. It is very more notable than one ferry. But we should consider whether the word "amfibus" is a name of some specific project or it should be (or will be) a common term for all amphibious buses. --ŠJů (talk) 03:33, 11 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Oppose but include mention/link in this article. Finavon (talk) 00:15, 10 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I've removed the merge to tag from the Amfibus article. It's been five months since the original proposal and there has been no support for it. Therefore I conclude that the two articles should remain separate. Mjroots (talk) 21:02, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Renfrew Ferry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081208004230/http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk:80/docherty/cca/archive2008.html to http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/docherty/cca/archive2008.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:53, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic