This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the culture of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The article currently asserts that "it is likely (although the evidence is not conclusive) that it was performed solely for men as well". This is, as far as I know, not at all universally agreed on by scholars. To quote myself here, some of the recent (the last 30 years) scholarly input on the question of whether women were present in the theatre includes:
There's Goldhill (1994),[...] which IIRC comes down slightly more decisively than Goldhill (1997) against the view that women were able to attend, and Podlecki (1990), which I haven't tracked down, but Goldhill says along with Henderson "forms the fullest defence of the presence of women". Cantarella (2005) says that "recent scholarship tends to believe" that women did attend the theatre, but most unhelpfully doesn't actually cite any scholars in support of this; meanwhile Davidson 2005 says that recent scholarship is inconclusive and that he isn't going to get involved in the debate, but cites Goldhill and Henderson. Finally Katz (1998) says that the evidence is inconclusive, likely to remain that way, and cites (once again!) Henderson and Goldhill.
(Goldhill 1997, to which I refer, doesn't believe that Henderson's argument is convincing but doesn't come down strongly for the opposing view either).
I think this really needs a citation for the claim that the most likely answer is that women didn't attend the theatre; of the sources I know, the only one to address the scholarly consensus is also the most recent, and claims that most scholars believe precisely the opposite. It is, however, ten years out of date, so it's entirely possible that consensus has changed in that time. Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 23:33, 29 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
I feel the opening claims of this article ("was performed exclusively by men", "is likely [...] that it was performed solely for men") do not accurately reflect current scholarship, and make a disputed matter with little direct evidence seem like established and agreed fact. I would suggest that we find a wording that better reflects what is known and what is speculation/assumption. mooncow17:04, 17 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
